Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Olivia Tjandramulia vs Mika Dagan Fruchtman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tjandramulia vs Fruchtman analysis and find out who is favored!
Olivia Tjandramulia vs Mika Dagan Fruchtman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tjandramulia 2 - 0 Fruchtman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tjandramulia has won 39.13% of points on their second serve, while Fruchtman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tjandramulia, in recent form, has won 47.83% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fruchtman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.56% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tjandramulia has saved 48.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fruchtman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tjandramulia has won 18.18% of matches played (W/L 2/ 9), with Fruchtman winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tjandramulia has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 116/ 126), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 18% (W/L 2/ 9). Fruchtman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 37/ 41).
- Player level: In the last year, Tjandramulia has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 2/ 8), where as Fruchtman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tjandramulia winning 2 times and Fruchtman being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Tjandramulia winning 4 and Fruchtman winning 1. The last match between Tjandramulia and Fruchtman was at the W25 Netanya, 25-05-2022, First, Hard with Olivia Tjandramulia getting the victory 6-2 2-6 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tjandramulia and Fruchtman have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tjandramulia winning 1 times and Fruchtman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tjandramulia winning 0, and Fruchtman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tjandramulia has played against opponents with an average rank of 253.73 while Fruchtman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tjandramulia has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fruchtman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tjandramulia has converted 35.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fruchtman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
899
Rank
350
High
27
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
894
Rank
771
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
46% (175-206)
Career Total W/L
50% (53-53)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,725
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tjandramulia VS Fruchtman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Olivia Tjandramulia | Mika Dagan Fruchtman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 26 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:30 | 1:42:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (97/135) | 56% (66/117) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (59/97) | 61% (40/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (24/38) | 33% (17/51) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (10/19) | 21% (4/19) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (60/117) | 39% (52/135) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Tjandramulia VS Fruchtman H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 2-6 6-0 |
Stats 
Olivia Tjandramulia
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Olivia Tjandramulia
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Olivia Tjandramulia | Mika Dagan Fruchtman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 41% (32/47) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 9 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:15 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 230 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (117/186) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 53% (62/117) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 39% (27/69) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (6/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (81/204) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Olivia Tjandramulia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
79%
(
30 of
38)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
6 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
14 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dalila Jakupovic
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
27 of
37)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cristina Dinu
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olivia Tjandramulia
Player
Adelina Lachinova
89%
(
70 of
79)
1st Serve %
44%
(
36 of
82)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
55 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mika Dagan Fruchtman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kiara Cvetkovic
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michaela Laki
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
21 of
32)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natsuho Arakawa
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Julaluck Sae-Eung
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanni Liu
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Chompoothip Jandakate
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Nikita Liebkind
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
38 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Natcharee Teerachodjiranon
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Ogescu
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
17 of
29)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
13 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Tjandramulia Vs Fruchtman Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Tjandramulia are available here and Fruchtman photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
